[OE-core] [PATCH] bitbake.conf: Ignore MACHINE as dep for MACHINEOVERRIDES

[McClintock Matthew-B29882]

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 03:33:35PM -0600, Matthew McClintock wrote:
>> This dependency causes binutils to get rebuilt for some of
>> our parts that are the same TARGET_ARCH but different
>> MACHINE.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock <msm at freescale.com>
>> ---
>> Comments on this? It seems like it might be better to some do this
>> in the actual recipes (binutils, gcc-cross, etc) and not globally.
>> However, I'm not really sure what goes in MACHINEOVERIDES in
>> general and if it could be something that would cause sstate-cache
>> to be invalid althogh I could image some scenarios.
>>
>>  meta/conf/bitbake.conf |    1 +
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
>> index b4335c9..48ae458 100644
>> --- a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
>> +++ b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
>> @@ -659,6 +659,7 @@ AUTO_LIBNAME_PKGS = "${PACKAGES}"
>>  OVERRIDES = "${TARGET_OS}:${TARGET_ARCH}:build-${BUILD_OS}:pn-${PN}:${MACHINEOVERRIDES}:${DISTROOVERRIDES}:forcevariable"
>>  DISTROOVERRIDES ?= "${DISTRO}"
>>  MACHINEOVERRIDES ?= "${MACHINE}"
>> +MACHINEOVERRIDES[vardepsexclude] += "MACHINE"
>>
>>  CPU_FEATURES ?= ""
>>  CPU_FEATURES_arm ?= "vfp"
>> --
>> 1.7.6.1
>
> is this of oe-core/master?
>
> I see similar commit in 362512b83775ad7020e5870a594f0e7ca9ef83ba

It appears this has already been fixed. I was working on edison 1.1. Thanks!

-M