[OE-core] [PATCH 01/16] libnl2: Fix a race on route/pktloc_syntax.h

[Richard Purdie]

On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 18:28 +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Richard Purdie
> <richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 23:20 -0500, Matthew McClintock wrote:
> >> From: Tom Rini <tom_rini at mentor.com>
> >>
> >> At issue is that route/pktloc.c (not generated) depends on
> >> route/pktloc_syntax.h (generated).
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <tom_rini at mentor.com>
> >> ---
> >>  .../libnl/fix-pktloc_syntax_h-race.patch           |   23 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  meta/recipes-support/libnl/libnl_2.0.bb            |    3 +-
> >>  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>  create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/libnl/fix-pktloc_syntax_h-race.patch
> >>
> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libnl/fix-pktloc_syntax_h-race.patch b/meta/recipes-support/libnl/fix-pktloc_syntax_h-race.patch
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..d396f96
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/meta/recipes-support/libnl/fix-pktloc_syntax_h-race.patch
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
> >> +---
> >
> > Missing patch header...
> 
> How would I mark this when this is an old version of libnl and it
> appears not to be a problem the latest version of libnl?

I don't have the patch status field entries handy but you can certainly
document that the issue isn't present in version X so its likely been
fixed upstream already. I guess "Inappropriate" would cover that if
nothing else does.

Cheers,

Richard