[OE-core] [PATCH 01/16] libnl2: Fix a race on route/pktloc_syntax.h

[Saul Wold]

On 09/29/2011 11:38 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 18:28 +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Richard Purdie
>> <richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org>  wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 23:20 -0500, Matthew McClintock wrote:
>>>> From: Tom Rini<tom_rini at mentor.com>
>>>>
>>>> At issue is that route/pktloc.c (not generated) depends on
>>>> route/pktloc_syntax.h (generated).
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini<tom_rini at mentor.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   .../libnl/fix-pktloc_syntax_h-race.patch           |   23 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>   meta/recipes-support/libnl/libnl_2.0.bb            |    3 +-
>>>>   2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>>   create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/libnl/fix-pktloc_syntax_h-race.patch
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libnl/fix-pktloc_syntax_h-race.patch b/meta/recipes-support/libnl/fix-pktloc_syntax_h-race.patch
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..d396f96
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-support/libnl/fix-pktloc_syntax_h-race.patch
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
>>>> +---
>>>
>>> Missing patch header...
>>
>> How would I mark this when this is an old version of libnl and it
>> appears not to be a problem the latest version of libnl?
>
> I don't have the patch status field entries handy but you can certainly
> document that the issue isn't present in version X so its likely been
> fixed upstream already. I guess "Inappropriate" would cover that if
> nothing else does.
>
Just for reference:

http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines

This contains the Upstream-Status: entries.

Thanks
	Sau!

> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>