[OE-core] [PATCH] Improve handling of 'all' architecture recipes and their interaction with sstate

Richard Purdie richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org
Fri Sep 30 17:09:31 UTC 2011


On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 18:46 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 03:15:15PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > I'd not forgotten about this patch, just been distracted by other
> > things. I've run some further tests on the changes here and have
> > comments below. Summary is I think some pieces can merge, other pieces
> > need more work. Lets try and get the pieces that are ready merged, then
> > worry about the remainder.
> > 
> > Could we clean out the problematic pieces and resubmit please so we can
> > at least get those pieces in? :)
> 
> pushed as 6 patches to 
> oe-core-contrib jansa/allarch
> 
> 1st patch contains changes you've marked as fine
> 2nd is hal-info, which is imho not worth debugging it as nobody likes
>   hal nowadays (I've tried to patch configure.in, but recipe doesn't
>   call reautoconf IIRC..)
> the rest is kept as reminder which recipes needs to be taken care of.

Thanks. I've taken the two patches. I'd love to get rid of hal, in fact
its on my list of things that need to migrate out of OE-Core...

I'm left wondering what (if anything) uses hal in our images?

Cheers,

Richard





More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list