[OE-core] [PATCH] Improve handling of 'all' architecture recipes and their interaction with sstate

[Martin Jansa]

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 06:09:31PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 18:46 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 03:15:15PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > I'd not forgotten about this patch, just been distracted by other
> > > things. I've run some further tests on the changes here and have
> > > comments below. Summary is I think some pieces can merge, other pieces
> > > need more work. Lets try and get the pieces that are ready merged, then
> > > worry about the remainder.
> > > 
> > > Could we clean out the problematic pieces and resubmit please so we can
> > > at least get those pieces in? :)
> > 
> > pushed as 6 patches to 
> > oe-core-contrib jansa/allarch
> > 
> > 1st patch contains changes you've marked as fine
> > 2nd is hal-info, which is imho not worth debugging it as nobody likes
> >   hal nowadays (I've tried to patch configure.in, but recipe doesn't
> >   call reautoconf IIRC..)
> > the rest is kept as reminder which recipes needs to be taken care of.
> 
> Thanks. I've taken the two patches. I'd love to get rid of hal, in fact
> its on my list of things that need to migrate out of OE-Core...
> 
> I'm left wondering what (if anything) uses hal in our images?

ie xserver-xf86 before my changes..

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20110930/8f8a4d00/attachment-0002.sig>