[OE-core] [PATCH] libxml2: add missing dependency on binutils

[Khem Raj]

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Richard Purdie
<richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 11:07 -0800, Steve Sakoman wrote:
>> Otherwise build fails with following error:
>>
>> | In file included from libxml.h:36:0,
>> |                  from xmlmemory.c:8:
>> | ./include/libxml/xmlversion.h:396:22: fatal error: ansidecl.h: No such file or directory
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve at sakoman.com>
>> ---
>>  meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc |    2 +-
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc b/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc
>> index 0979acd..6230f60 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2.inc
>> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://Copyright;md5=bb90c48926316d9af6e2d70ca7013ade \
>>                      file://trio.c;beginline=5;endline=14;md5=6c025753c86d958722ec76e94cae932e"
>>
>>  DEPENDS_virtclass-native = "python-native"
>> -DEPENDS =+ "zlib"
>> +DEPENDS =+ "zlib binutils"
>>
>>  SRC_URI = "ftp://xmlsoft.org/libxml2/libxml2-${PV}.tar.gz \
>>             file://libxml-64bit.patch"
>
> This sounds very wrong. It would have implications for libxml2-native
> I'd imagine. What is it doing that needs binutils?

configure detects the header and then uses it. So as long as you provide
binutils or not provide consistently it will build in a consistent way
whats happening here probably is that its configured with binutils-dev
being staged but is building without then being in staging.


>
> Its going to add considerable time to the build too.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core