[OE-core] Fwd: [oe] Source Archiver Class

[Chris Larson]

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Xiaofeng Yan
<xiaofeng.yan at windriver.com> wrote:
> On 2012年02月22日 00:57, Saul Wold wrote:
>>
>> On 02/19/2012 10:40 PM, Xiaofeng Yan wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2012年02月18日 07:52, Saul Wold wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>
> Hi Saul,
>
> I have implemented the most functions but srpm functions. I will complete
> the left work(merge functions from sourcepkg, src_distribute  to
> archiver.bbclass, implement srpm functions. )
>
>
>>>> Xiaofeng & Community:
>>>>
>>>> We had a chat with Chris Larson and Mark Hatle here at ELC.
>>>>
>>>> We focused this issue down to a fewer number of options that meet the
>>>> needs of the licenses. Please review this and let us know if there are
>>>> any issues or concerns.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Hi Saul,
>>>
>>> I comment my understanding as follow:
>>>>
>>>> Best Practices:
>>>> - Archive during build, we do not support nor recommend post archiving
>>>> - Original tarball and patches w/ordering file (maybe comment the
>>>> series), grab non-patch files also.
>>>
>>> for example:
>>> file://a.patch
>>> file://b.config.in
>>> we also archive b.config.in.
>>
>>
>> Yes, correct.
>>
>>>> - Unless requesting configured sources, which will just be the
>>>> configured source tarball
>>>> - Grab temp as postfunc of do_package - latest logs via links & pid
>>>>
>>> That means logs package include all of logs in temp. for example.
>>> You has described a following function we will realize at the previous
>>> email.
>>> 3 - Original Source code & Patches & temp (scripts & logs)
>>>
>>> source codes and patches should be in the stage do_patch[postfunc] = "
>>> do_get_source"
>>> logs should be in the stage do_package[postfunc] = " do_get_logs"
>>> So logs file shouldn't be archived in do_patch[postfunc] = " do_get_logs"
>>> The logs in the stage of do_packge are more than do_patch.
>>>
>> Correct, you want to get the logs and scripts from temp when they are most
>> complete (after do_package not after do_patch).
>>
>> As mentioned below, you would use the variable SOURCE_ARCHIVE_LOG in the
>> do_package[postfunc] to determine if you need to archive the logs or not.
>>
>>
>>>> For sstate Builds (LATER):
>>>> - need to verify that fetch/patch/configure will get re-run for
>>>> archiving
>>>> - Add temp dir to sstate capture (without links)
>>>>
>>>> 3 Implementations classes
>>>> - Filter in oe/lib/license.py
>>>> - source_archive.bb
>>>> - archives tarballs to ${BP}/...
>>>> - reuse copyleft_compliance for patch handling
>>>> - srpm
>>>> - take output from above and create SRPM - (LATER)
>>>>
>>> We will do the archive work according the license . I will implement two
>>> functions, one is for left, the other for right.
>>
>> I am not sure what you mean by one is for left and the other is for right?
>>
>> Can you explain your thoughts here.
>
> I mean I need implement a function to select to archive the packages from
> copyright(no free)or copyleft(free).

This is the filtering to put in license.py, and which is implemented
in copyleft_compliance.bbclass. It should largely be a copy/paste from
there..
-- 
Christopher Larson