[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] linux-tools: add binutils to perf DEPENDS

[Richard Purdie]

On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 16:32 +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Joshua Lock <josh at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > We have witnessed non-deterministic failures of perf for some platforms
> > whilst looking for bfd.h, a header provided by binutils.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <josh at linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc |    2 +-
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc
> > index 950f197..aa45dba 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc
> > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ addtask install_perf after do_install before do_package
> >  do_compile_perf[umask] = 022
> >  do_install_perf[umask] = 022
> >
> > -PERFDEPENDS = "virtual/${MLPREFIX}libc:do_populate_sysroot ${MLPREFIX}elfutils:do_populate_sysroot"
> > +PERFDEPENDS = "virtual/${MLPREFIX}libc:do_populate_sysroot ${MLPREFIX}elfutils:do_populate_sysroot ${MLPREFIX}binutils:do_populate_sysroot"
> 
> Does this build the rpm for binutils too? I've seen the following
> error recently when creating the rfs:
> 
> | error: Failed dependencies:
> | 	binutils >= 2.21.1a is needed by perf-3.0.6-r2.p3060qds
> | 	libbfd-2.21.1.so is needed by perf-3.0.6-r2.p3060qds

I suspect the patch is not enough to fix this...

Cheers,

Richard