[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] linux-tools: add binutils to perf DEPENDS

[McClintock Matthew-B29882]

On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Richard Purdie
<richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 16:32 +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Joshua Lock <josh at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> > We have witnessed non-deterministic failures of perf for some platforms
>> > whilst looking for bfd.h, a header provided by binutils.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <josh at linux.intel.com>
>> > ---
>> >  meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc |    2 +-
>> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc
>> > index 950f197..aa45dba 100644
>> > --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc
>> > +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc
>> > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ addtask install_perf after do_install before do_package
>> >  do_compile_perf[umask] = 022
>> >  do_install_perf[umask] = 022
>> >
>> > -PERFDEPENDS = "virtual/${MLPREFIX}libc:do_populate_sysroot ${MLPREFIX}elfutils:do_populate_sysroot"
>> > +PERFDEPENDS = "virtual/${MLPREFIX}libc:do_populate_sysroot ${MLPREFIX}elfutils:do_populate_sysroot ${MLPREFIX}binutils:do_populate_sysroot"
>>
>> Does this build the rpm for binutils too? I've seen the following
>> error recently when creating the rfs:
>>
>> | error: Failed dependencies:
>> |     binutils >= 2.21.1a is needed by perf-3.0.6-r2.p3060qds
>> |     libbfd-2.21.1.so is needed by perf-3.0.6-r2.p3060qds
>
> I suspect the patch is not enough to fix this...

The error went away after adding this, but I'm not 100% the rpm's
where not available the next time regardless of this patch.

-M