[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] opkg 0.1.8: do_fetch failed since no checksum specified
Martin Jansa
martin.jansa at gmail.com
Thu Jun 7 09:31:44 UTC 2012
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 05:24:39PM +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
> * We use meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_svn.bb by default, the
> opkg_0.1.8.bb failed since no checksum specified.
>
> * The add_vercmp.patch in both opkg/ and opkg-0.1.8/, remove the one
> in opkg-0.1.8/
>
> This patch doesn't impact the output, so I think that we don't have to
> increment the PR.
>
> [YOCTO #2498]
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang at windriver.com>
> ---
> .../opkg/opkg-0.1.8/add_vercmp.patch | 36 --------------------
> meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_0.1.8.bb | 5 ++-
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg-0.1.8/add_vercmp.patch
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg-0.1.8/add_vercmp.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg-0.1.8/add_vercmp.patch
> deleted file mode 100644
> index c3396d5..0000000
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg-0.1.8/add_vercmp.patch
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
> -Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [other]
> -
> -Index: trunk/libopkg/opkg.c
> -===================================================================
> ---- trunk.orig/libopkg/opkg.c 2010-01-26 20:32:19.000000000 +0000
> -+++ trunk/libopkg/opkg.c 2010-01-26 20:40:34.000000000 +0000
> -@@ -876,3 +876,18 @@
> -
> - return ret;
> - }
> -+
> -+int
> -+opkg_compare_versions (const char *ver1, const char *ver2)
> -+{
> -+ pkg_t *pkg1, *pkg2;
> -+
> -+ pkg1 = pkg_new();
> -+ pkg2 = pkg_new();
> -+
> -+ parse_version(pkg1, ver1);
> -+ parse_version(pkg2, ver2);
> -+
> -+ return pkg_compare_versions(pkg1, pkg2);
> -+}
> -+
> -Index: trunk/libopkg/opkg.h
> -===================================================================
> ---- trunk.orig/libopkg/opkg.h 2010-01-26 20:32:19.000000000 +0000
> -+++ trunk/libopkg/opkg.h 2010-01-26 20:35:19.000000000 +0000
> -@@ -58,4 +58,6 @@
> -
> - int opkg_repository_accessibility_check(void);
> -
> -+int opkg_compare_versions (const char *ver1, const char *ver2);
> -+
> - #endif /* OPKG_H */
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_0.1.8.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_0.1.8.bb
> index c206b37..785b6ca 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_0.1.8.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_0.1.8.bb
> @@ -1,8 +1,11 @@
> require opkg.inc
>
> SRC_URI = "http://opkg.googlecode.com/files/opkg-${PV}.tar.gz \
> - file://add_vercmp.patch \
> + file://opkg/add_vercmp.patch \
is this "opkg/" really needed?
> file://headerfix.patch \
> "
>
> +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "c714ce0e4863bf1315e3b6913ffe3299"
> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "ff94bf30bd662d49c4b5057e3a0818d062731adaa555d59abd677ec32a3c1c60"
> +
> PR = "${INC_PR}.0"
> --
> 1.7.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20120607/0915a464/attachment-0002.sig>
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list