[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] opkg 0.1.8: do_fetch failed since no checksum specified

[Saul Wold]

On 06/07/2012 02:31 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 05:24:39PM +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
>> * We use meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_svn.bb by default, the
>>    opkg_0.1.8.bb failed since no checksum specified.
>>
>> * The add_vercmp.patch in both opkg/ and opkg-0.1.8/, remove the one
>>    in opkg-0.1.8/
>>
>> This patch doesn't impact the output, so I think that we don't have to
>> increment the PR.
>>
>> [YOCTO #2498]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robert Yang<liezhi.yang at windriver.com>
>> ---
>>   .../opkg/opkg-0.1.8/add_vercmp.patch               |   36 --------------------
>>   meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_0.1.8.bb           |    5 ++-
>>   2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>>   delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg-0.1.8/add_vercmp.patch
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg-0.1.8/add_vercmp.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg-0.1.8/add_vercmp.patch
>> deleted file mode 100644
>> index c3396d5..0000000
>> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg-0.1.8/add_vercmp.patch
>> +++ /dev/null
>> @@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
>> -Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [other]
>> -
>> -Index: trunk/libopkg/opkg.c
>> -===================================================================
>> ---- trunk.orig/libopkg/opkg.c	2010-01-26 20:32:19.000000000 +0000
>> -+++ trunk/libopkg/opkg.c	2010-01-26 20:40:34.000000000 +0000
>> -@@ -876,3 +876,18 @@
>> -
>> - 	return ret;
>> - }
>> -+
>> -+int
>> -+opkg_compare_versions (const char *ver1, const char *ver2)
>> -+{
>> -+  pkg_t *pkg1, *pkg2;
>> -+
>> -+  pkg1 = pkg_new();
>> -+  pkg2 = pkg_new();
>> -+
>> -+  parse_version(pkg1, ver1);
>> -+  parse_version(pkg2, ver2);
>> -+
>> -+  return pkg_compare_versions(pkg1, pkg2);
>> -+}
>> -+
>> -Index: trunk/libopkg/opkg.h
>> -===================================================================
>> ---- trunk.orig/libopkg/opkg.h	2010-01-26 20:32:19.000000000 +0000
>> -+++ trunk/libopkg/opkg.h	2010-01-26 20:35:19.000000000 +0000
>> -@@ -58,4 +58,6 @@
>> -
>> - int opkg_repository_accessibility_check(void);
>> -
>> -+int opkg_compare_versions (const char *ver1, const char *ver2);
>> -+
>> - #endif /* OPKG_H */
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_0.1.8.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_0.1.8.bb
>> index c206b37..785b6ca 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_0.1.8.bb
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_0.1.8.bb
>> @@ -1,8 +1,11 @@
>>   require opkg.inc
>>
>>   SRC_URI = "http://opkg.googlecode.com/files/opkg-${PV}.tar.gz \
>> -           file://add_vercmp.patch \
>> +           file://opkg/add_vercmp.patch \
>
> is this "opkg/" really needed?
>
If it's getting removed, is it needed at all?

Sau!

>>              file://headerfix.patch \
>>             "
>>
>> +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "c714ce0e4863bf1315e3b6913ffe3299"
>> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "ff94bf30bd662d49c4b5057e3a0818d062731adaa555d59abd677ec32a3c1c60"
>> +
>>   PR = "${INC_PR}.0"
>> --
>> 1.7.1
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core