[OE-core] Missing Patch Headers

[Bruce Ashfield]

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> We recently had a spat of new patches added without patch headers, ie no
> patch comment, Signed-off-by or Upstream-Status.
>
> Please review this list and update the patch and submit a new commit.
>
> Zhai Edwin -
> meta/recipes-graphics/pango/pango-1.28.4/multilib-fix-clean.patch
> Laurentiu Palcu -
> meta/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb/libdirect-remove-include-of-linux-config.h.patch
> Cristian Iorga -
> meta/recipes-extended/ltp/ltp/fix_building_fom_archive.patch
> Xiaofeng Yan - meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbinitscripts/functions.patch
> Mark Hatle - meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/binutils-armv5e.patch
> Mark Hatle - meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-resolvedep.patch
> Andreas Müller -
> meta/recipes-kernel/systemtap/systemtap/runtime-staprun-configure.ac-support-without-nss-for.patch
> Bruce Ashfield -
> meta/recipes-kernel/lttng-2.0/lttng-modules/lttng-sycalls-protect-is_compat_task-from-redefiniti.patch

Your script is wrong here. That patch has everything you'd expect,
since it follows kernel
patch conventions. Subject, shortlog, log log and sign-off.

So don't expect any resubmission from me on this one, since I won't be
putting an upstream
status directly in the patch.

Bruce

>
>
> Thanks
> --
>    Sau!
>
> Saul Wold
> Yocto Component Wrangler @ Intel
> Yocto Project / Poky Build System
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core



-- 
"Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
thee at its end"