[OE-core] Missing Patch Headers

[Saul Wold]

On 06/11/2012 08:34 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Saul Wold<sgw at linux.intel.com>  wrote:
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> We recently had a spat of new patches added without patch headers, ie no
>> patch comment, Signed-off-by or Upstream-Status.
>>
>> Please review this list and update the patch and submit a new commit.
>>
>> Zhai Edwin -
>> meta/recipes-graphics/pango/pango-1.28.4/multilib-fix-clean.patch
>> Laurentiu Palcu -
>> meta/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb/libdirect-remove-include-of-linux-config.h.patch
>> Cristian Iorga -
>> meta/recipes-extended/ltp/ltp/fix_building_fom_archive.patch
>> Xiaofeng Yan - meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbinitscripts/functions.patch
>> Mark Hatle - meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/binutils-armv5e.patch
>> Mark Hatle - meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-resolvedep.patch
>> Andreas Müller -
>> meta/recipes-kernel/systemtap/systemtap/runtime-staprun-configure.ac-support-without-nss-for.patch
>> Bruce Ashfield -
>> meta/recipes-kernel/lttng-2.0/lttng-modules/lttng-sycalls-protect-is_compat_task-from-redefiniti.patch
>
> Your script is wrong here. That patch has everything you'd expect,
> since it follows kernel
> patch conventions. Subject, shortlog, log log and sign-off.
>
> So don't expect any resubmission from me on this one, since I won't be
> putting an upstream
> status directly in the patch.
>
This is a patch in OE-Core, not in the kernel, there is no reason you 
can't update this patch to include the Upstream-Status:? What is the 
status of this patch anyway?  Is it a backport?

Sau!



> Bruce
>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> --
>>     Sau!
>>
>> Saul Wold
>> Yocto Component Wrangler @ Intel
>> Yocto Project / Poky Build System
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
>
>