[OE-core] [PATCH] linux-tools: multilib compilation fix
Richard Purdie
richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org
Thu Jun 21 12:29:49 UTC 2012
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 11:25 +0300, Bogdan Marinescu wrote:
> This patch makes linux-tools compile properly on multilib configurations
> (which failed because of some invalid dependencies). Tested by compiling
> lib32-core-image-sato-sdk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu <bogdan.a.marinescu at intel.com>
> ---
> meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc
> index 3b03c05..048608c 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ do_install_perf[umask] = "022"
>
> PERFDEPENDS = "virtual/${MLPREFIX}libc:do_populate_sysroot ${MLPREFIX}elfutils:do_populate_sysroot ${MLPREFIX}binutils:do_populate_sysroot"
> PERFDEPENDS_libc-uclibc = ""
> -PERFRDEPENDS = "python perl elfutils"
> +PERFRDEPENDS = "${MLPREFIX}python ${MLPREFIX}perl ${MLPREFIX}elfutils"
> PERFRDEPENDS_libc-uclibc = ""
>
> do_compile_perf[depends] = "${PERFDEPENDS}"
Bruce has just totally rearranged this code. Could you check if the new
recipe still suffers from this issue please?
Cheers,
Richard
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list