[OE-core] [PATCH] linux-tools: multilib compilation fix

[Marinescu, Bogdan A]

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Richard Purdie
<richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 11:25 +0300, Bogdan Marinescu wrote:
>> This patch makes linux-tools compile properly on multilib configurations
>> (which failed because of some invalid dependencies). Tested by compiling
>> lib32-core-image-sato-sdk.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu <bogdan.a.marinescu at intel.com>
>> ---
>>  meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc |    2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc
>> index 3b03c05..048608c 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc
>> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ do_install_perf[umask] = "022"
>>
>>  PERFDEPENDS = "virtual/${MLPREFIX}libc:do_populate_sysroot ${MLPREFIX}elfutils:do_populate_sysroot ${MLPREFIX}binutils:do_populate_sysroot"
>>  PERFDEPENDS_libc-uclibc = ""
>> -PERFRDEPENDS = "python perl elfutils"
>> +PERFRDEPENDS = "${MLPREFIX}python ${MLPREFIX}perl ${MLPREFIX}elfutils"
>>  PERFRDEPENDS_libc-uclibc = ""
>>
>>  do_compile_perf[depends] = "${PERFDEPENDS}"
>
> Bruce has just totally rearranged this code. Could you check if the new
> recipe still suffers from this issue please?

Sure, I'm on it.

Thanks,
Bogdan

>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core