[OE-core] does it make sense to define INITSCRIPT_* without inheriting update-rc.d?

[Andrei Gherzan]

No. It won't make a difference. Or actually it makes a tiny difference:
check package.bbclass, function named gen_packagevar.

@g


On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday at crashcourse.ca>wrote:

>
>  currently figuring out details of INITSCRIPT_*, and noticed that the
> recipe file irda-utils_0.9.18.bb assigned values to both
> INITSCRIPT_NAME and INITSCRIPT_PARAMS without inheriting update-rc.d.
>
>  is that allowed?  does it make sense?  unless the explicit
> do_install() routine in that recipe file somehow takes care of things.
>
> rday
>
> --
>
> ========================================================================
> Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
>                        http://crashcourse.ca
>
> Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
> LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
> ========================================================================
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20120630/b9ff99b1/attachment-0002.html>