[OE-core] does it make sense to define INITSCRIPT_* without inheriting update-rc.d?

[Robert P. J. Day]

On Sat, 30 Jun 2012, Andrei Gherzan wrote:

> No. It won't make a difference. Or actually it makes a tiny
> difference: check package.bbclass, function named gen_packagevar.
>
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday at crashcourse.ca> wrote:
>
>        currently figuring out details of INITSCRIPT_*, and noticed that the
>       recipe file irda-utils_0.9.18.bb assigned values to both
>       INITSCRIPT_NAME and INITSCRIPT_PARAMS without inheriting update-rc.d.
>
>        is that allowed?  does it make sense?  unless the explicit
>       do_install() routine in that recipe file somehow takes care of things.
>
>       rday

  i'm unclear on what i'm supposed to be looking at in that function,
and how it answers my question.

rday

p.s.  please don't top post.

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================