[OE-core] does it make sense to define INITSCRIPT_* without inheriting update-rc.d?

[Robert P. J. Day]

On Sat, 30 Jun 2012, Mark Hatle wrote:

> On 6/30/12 9:57 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 30 Jun 2012, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
> >
> > > No. It won't make a difference. Or actually it makes a tiny
> > > difference: check package.bbclass, function named gen_packagevar.
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday at crashcourse.ca>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >         currently figuring out details of INITSCRIPT_*, and noticed that
> > > the
> > >        recipe file irda-utils_0.9.18.bb assigned values to both
> > >        INITSCRIPT_NAME and INITSCRIPT_PARAMS without inheriting
> > > update-rc.d.
>
> Anything using those variables should inherit the class.  Otherwise
> it may not work as expected down the line when things change.

  which is what i suspected.  i'll submit a patch to add the missing
line if it's really supposed to be there.

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================