[OE-core] [PATCH] rootfs_ipk, image: Add debug capture support

[Phil Blundell]

On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 09:39 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 4/26/13 9:27 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 09:16 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> >> The alternative of course is to crease special -dbg packages for the two
> >> conflicting items.  I.e. foo-dbg, foo-sulogin-dbg, bar-dbg and bar-sulogin-dbg...
> >
> > Yeah, indeed, that's what I suggested in my original email.  At the time
> > I thought that would be hard to arrange (in the general case), but
> > having given it some further consideration perhaps it isn't all that bad
> > after all.
> 
> I certainly wouldn't be against an enhancement that tries to match up the 
> binaries to their debug and create suitably named -dbg packages.  The only 
> tricky part is what to do with the associated sources?  Since those are not 
> arranged according to binaries, but generally for the whole recipe.

The sources can stay where they are, in ${PN}-dbg.  There won't be any
conflict there because the installed files are already namespaced by
recipe.

p.