[OE-core] [PATCH] rootfs_ipk, image: Add debug capture support
Otavio Salvador
otavio at ossystems.com.br
Fri Apr 26 14:50:04 UTC 2013
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Phil Blundell <pb at pbcl.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 09:39 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> On 4/26/13 9:27 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 09:16 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> >> The alternative of course is to crease special -dbg packages for the two
>> >> conflicting items. I.e. foo-dbg, foo-sulogin-dbg, bar-dbg and bar-sulogin-dbg...
>> >
>> > Yeah, indeed, that's what I suggested in my original email. At the time
>> > I thought that would be hard to arrange (in the general case), but
>> > having given it some further consideration perhaps it isn't all that bad
>> > after all.
>>
>> I certainly wouldn't be against an enhancement that tries to match up the
>> binaries to their debug and create suitably named -dbg packages. The only
>> tricky part is what to do with the associated sources? Since those are not
>> arranged according to binaries, but generally for the whole recipe.
>
> The sources can stay where they are, in ${PN}-dbg. There won't be any
> conflict there because the installed files are already namespaced by
> recipe.
Maybe add a ${PN}-source with it? So any -dbg could rdepends on it?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: otavio at ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list