[OE-core] Why is "bitbake core-image-minimal" building gtk docs?

[Laszlo Papp]

I am not saying to fix gtk-doc-stub only. I am saying fix the nastiness of
using git repositories for released and supposedly stable versions. I do
not see why tarball would not be enough for those to work off-hand? That
should be the ideal architecture IMHO.


On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton at intel.com>wrote:

> On 21 August 2013 11:16, Laszlo Papp <lpapp at kde.org> wrote:
>
>> Having had an inconvenient debugging session this morning with the help
>> of you, ndec, and so forth on IRC, I would propose to get rid of this gtk
>> doc stub, at least how it is now. It is completely breaking projects
>> causing regressions compared to denzil. We are pretty much blocked by it
>> altogether now. Here is the other thread for details:
>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/poky/2013-August/009184.html
>>
>> IMHO, there should be a way for end users to get rid of the blocker issue
>> and regression. So, how about making this optional?
>>
>
> We used to patch each recipe individually and it wasn't pleasant.
>  gtk-doc-stub is just the first place you're hitting problems with putting
> DL_DIR inside a git repository, removing it will cause something else to
> break.
>
> Ross
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20130821/e6c580bc/attachment-0002.html>