[OE-core] [PATCH 4/7] oe-git-proxy: Add a new comprehensive git proxy script

Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfield at gmail.com
Sun Feb 10 02:48:58 UTC 2013


On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Otavio Salvador <otavio at ossystems.com.br>wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Darren Hart <dvhart at linux.intel.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 02/08/2013 06:43 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Darren Hart <dvhart at linux.intel.com>
> wrote:
> >>> oe-git-proxy.sh is a simple tool to be used via GIT_PROXY_COMMAND. It
> >>> uses BSD netcat to make SOCKS5 or HTTPS proxy connections. It uses
> >>> ALL_PROXY to determine the proxy server, protocol, and port. It uses
> >>> NO_PROXY to skip using the proxy for a comma delimited list of hosts,
> >>> host globs (*.example.com), IPs, or CIDR masks (192.168.1.0/24). It is
> >>> known to work with both bash and dash shells.
> >>>
> >>> V2: Implement recommendations by Enrico Scholz:
> >>>     o Use exec for the nc calls
> >>>     o Use "$@" instead of $* to avoid quoting issues inherent with $*
> >>>     o Use bash explicitly and simplify some of the string manipulations
> >>>     Also:
> >>>     o Drop the .sh in the name per Otavio Salvador
> >>>     o Remove a stray debug statement
> >>>
> >>> V3: Implement recommendations by Otavio Salvador
> >>>     o GPL license blurb
> >>>     o Fix minor typo in comment block
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhart at linux.intel.com>
> >>> Cc: Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz at sigma-chemnitz.de>
> >>> Cc: Otavio Salvador <otavio at ossystems.com.br>
> >>>
> >>> git-proxy cleanup
> >>
> >> All those comments ought to be bellow --- or those will be included in
> >> commit log.
> >>
> >
> > Which is fine.
>
> Well, usually the log of the revisions are not included in the commit
> logs; any special reason for it to be done different?
>

Randomly jumping in,

It's not all that uncommon for kernel developers to keep the revision
history
in long logs. It's used as a way to track the intermediate history, give
review credit .. or just "because".

So while not always done, it isn't unheard of. I have no strong opinion one
way or the other, just thought I'd throw that out!

Cheers,

Bruce


>
> --
> Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
> E-mail: otavio at ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
> Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>



-- 
"Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee
at its end"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20130209/4594330c/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list