[OE-core] [PATCH] qmake2.bbclass: export OE_QMAKE_QT_CONFIG

Felipe Tonello eu at felipetonello.com
Thu Jun 6 19:18:19 UTC 2013


On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Paul Eggleton
<paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 June 2013 10:01:09 Saul Wold wrote:
>> On 06/05/2013 09:57 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 05 June 2013 09:46:49 Saul Wold wrote:
>> >> On 06/05/2013 02:30 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
>> >>> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 07:01:50PM +1000, Jonathan Liu wrote:
>> >>>> qconfig.pri was not being loaded by qmake properly. This means Qt
>> >>>> qmake projects are unable to query QT_ARCH, QT_VERSION and other
>> >>>> variables defined in qconfig.pri.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Export OE_QMAKE_QT_CONFIG, setting it to the location of qconfig.pri
>> >>>> so that it can be located by qmake.
>> >>>
>> >>> There is such patch already:
>> >>> http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2013-May/07831
>> >>> 4.
>> >>> html
>> >>
>> >> Got lost in my queue, adding it for the next MUT.
>> >
>> > FWIW I am still concerned by the assertion in the commit message about it
>> > causing undesirable behaviour. I'd want that checked out and the note
>> > removed before we look at merging this.
>>
>> OK, I will shelf this until I hear more about the testing of this change
>> regarding the original patch's note.
>
> So I tested a rebuild of qt4-x11-free with Felipe's patch and two of
> Jonathan's ("qt4: fix QMAKE_QT_CONFIG being overwritten with empty value" and
> "classes/qmake_base: allow parallel make"), and did not observe any unexpected
> behaviour and buildhistory looks clean for qt itself and fotowall/quicky. So
> I'd say feel free to throw these into MUT, but I think we need to drop the
> note.
>

Awesome.

Thank you,
Felipe



More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list