[OE-core] [PATCH] qmake2.bbclass: export OE_QMAKE_QT_CONFIG

[Saul Wold]

On 06/06/2013 12:18 PM, Felipe Tonello wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Paul Eggleton
> <paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> On Wednesday 05 June 2013 10:01:09 Saul Wold wrote:
>>> On 06/05/2013 09:57 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday 05 June 2013 09:46:49 Saul Wold wrote:
>>>>> On 06/05/2013 02:30 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 07:01:50PM +1000, Jonathan Liu wrote:
>>>>>>> qconfig.pri was not being loaded by qmake properly. This means Qt
>>>>>>> qmake projects are unable to query QT_ARCH, QT_VERSION and other
>>>>>>> variables defined in qconfig.pri.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Export OE_QMAKE_QT_CONFIG, setting it to the location of qconfig.pri
>>>>>>> so that it can be located by qmake.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is such patch already:
>>>>>> http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2013-May/07831
>>>>>> 4.
>>>>>> html
>>>>>
>>>>> Got lost in my queue, adding it for the next MUT.
>>>>
>>>> FWIW I am still concerned by the assertion in the commit message about it
>>>> causing undesirable behaviour. I'd want that checked out and the note
>>>> removed before we look at merging this.
>>>
>>> OK, I will shelf this until I hear more about the testing of this change
>>> regarding the original patch's note.
>>
>> So I tested a rebuild of qt4-x11-free with Felipe's patch and two of
>> Jonathan's ("qt4: fix QMAKE_QT_CONFIG being overwritten with empty value" and
>> "classes/qmake_base: allow parallel make"), and did not observe any unexpected
>> behaviour and buildhistory looks clean for qt itself and fotowall/quicky. So
>> I'd say feel free to throw these into MUT, but I think we need to drop the
>> note.
>>
>
> Awesome.

So can someone put a final updated patch series together.  I am still 
not sure about Jonathans's allow parallel make change, it seemed to have 
the -j option since it's added with a _prepend which is not overriden by 
the = assignment.

Sau!

>
> Thank you,
> Felipe
>
>