[OE-core] [PATCH] qmake2.bbclass: export OE_QMAKE_QT_CONFIG

[Jonathan Liu]

On 07/06/2013, at 6:07 AM, Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On 06/06/2013 12:18 PM, Felipe Tonello wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Paul Eggleton
>> <paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 05 June 2013 10:01:09 Saul Wold wrote:
>>>> On 06/05/2013 09:57 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>>>>> On Wednesday 05 June 2013 09:46:49 Saul Wold wrote:
>>>>>> On 06/05/2013 02:30 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 07:01:50PM +1000, Jonathan Liu wrote:
>>>>>>>> qconfig.pri was not being loaded by qmake properly. This means Qt
>>>>>>>> qmake projects are unable to query QT_ARCH, QT_VERSION and other
>>>>>>>> variables defined in qconfig.pri.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Export OE_QMAKE_QT_CONFIG, setting it to the location of qconfig.pri
>>>>>>>> so that it can be located by qmake.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is such patch already:
>>>>>>> http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2013-May/07831
>>>>>>> 4.
>>>>>>> html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Got lost in my queue, adding it for the next MUT.
>>>>>
>>>>> FWIW I am still concerned by the assertion in the commit message about it
>>>>> causing undesirable behaviour. I'd want that checked out and the note
>>>>> removed before we look at merging this.
>>>>
>>>> OK, I will shelf this until I hear more about the testing of this change
>>>> regarding the original patch's note.
>>>
>>> So I tested a rebuild of qt4-x11-free with Felipe's patch and two of
>>> Jonathan's ("qt4: fix QMAKE_QT_CONFIG being overwritten with empty value" and
>>> "classes/qmake_base: allow parallel make"), and did not observe any unexpected
>>> behaviour and buildhistory looks clean for qt itself and fotowall/quicky. So
>>> I'd say feel free to throw these into MUT, but I think we need to drop the
>>> note.
>>
>> Awesome.
>
> So can someone put a final updated patch series together.  I am still not sure about Jonathans's allow parallel make change, it seemed to have the -j option since it's added with a _prepend which is not overriden by the = assignment.
>
> Sau!

It has make -j 16 MAKEFLAGS=.
-j 16 adds to MAKEFLAGS, and MAKEFLAGS= clears it. It is trivial to
check this is the case and I have verified it both when building
fotowall and independently on command line for building Qt projects
outside of Yocto.

Regards,
Jonathan

>
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Felipe
>>
>>