[OE-core] [PATCH V2 9/9] tinylogin: remove recipe

[Phil Blundell]

On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 11:28 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> The thinking is therefore we should therefore create a replacement for
> it from busybox. People are nervous about making busybox entirely SUID
> but having some small subset of it seems like a reasonable compromise.

The difficulty with this in the past has always been that the way
busybox is structured makes it quite difficult to tell which parts of
the code might actually end up being executed in setuid context.  But
maybe that situation has improved now, I dunno.

p.