[OE-core] [PATCH V2 9/9] tinylogin: remove recipe

[Richard Purdie]

On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 11:59 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 11:28 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > The thinking is therefore we should therefore create a replacement for
> > it from busybox. People are nervous about making busybox entirely SUID
> > but having some small subset of it seems like a reasonable compromise.
> 
> The difficulty with this in the past has always been that the way
> busybox is structured makes it quite difficult to tell which parts of
> the code might actually end up being executed in setuid context.  But
> maybe that situation has improved now, I dunno.

The plan (and I believe what this series does) is to have two busybox
binaries, one is suid (as small a subset as we really need) and the
other is not and hence this hopefully goes some way to reassuring people
about that.

Cheers,

Richard