[OE-core] [PATCH V2 1/9] busybox: remove the postinst part of the recipe
ChenQi
Qi.Chen at windriver.com
Tue Jun 18 01:37:24 UTC 2013
On 06/18/2013 01:52 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 2:49 AM, <Qi.Chen at windriver.com> wrote:
>> From: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen at windriver.com>
>>
>> Remove the pkg_postinst_${PN} from this recipe, as it's redundant.
>> It basically wants to do the same thing as the update-alternatives
>> does. But it doesn't do it well.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen at windriver.com>
> Most of patch 1 and 2 should be merged; here you should drop the
> postinst and convert these to the update-alternative way so we don't
> have the tree broken after this patch and allow for bisect to be
> used.
Hi Otavio,
Maybe there's some misunderstanding here.
To be clear, patch 1 and patch 2 do two different things.
Patch 1 removes postinst, it has nothing to do with patch 2, which fix
busybox.inc to support the FEATURE_INDIVIDUAL.
And after this patch (patch 1), the tree is not broken. The busybox
still works as it has been working so far.
[
And I just did a simple test to confirm this. On the lastest master, I
removed the postinst part of busybox.inc, and built a
core-image-minimal, it worked out well. Here's some output.
root at qemuarm:~# ls -l /bin/ | grep busybox
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Jun 18 01:31 ash -> /bin/busybox
-rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 556824 Jun 18 01:27 busybox
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Jun 18 01:31 cat -> /bin/busybox
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Jun 18 01:31 chattr ->
/bin/busybox
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Jun 18 01:31 chgrp ->
/bin/busybox
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Jun 18 01:31 chmod ->
/bin/busybox
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Jun 18 01:31 chown ->
/bin/busybox
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Jun 18 01:31 cp -> /bin/busybox
....
]
Best Regards,
Chen Qi
> --
> Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
> http://www.ossystems.com.br http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
> Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
>
>
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list