[OE-core] [PATCH] classes: add aarch64_be target

[Khem Raj]

On Oct 10, 2013, at 11:48 PM, Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:

> 
> Op 11 okt. 2013, om 07:37 heeft Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu at nigauri.org> het volgende geschreven:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I have a question.
>> Why don't you unite  name rules of  other architecture?
>> Forexample, armeb is endian-big of arm.  mipsel is endian-little of mips.
>> If you can unified name, arm64eb is better, I think.
> 
> In an ideal world I'd do that, but that ghastly 'aarch64_be' is already in upstream gcc, binutils and eglibc  :(
> 

Now that you work with them. can you find out the reasoning behind it ?