[OE-core] [PATCH] classes: add aarch64_be target

[Fathi Boudra]

On 11 October 2013 09:53, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Oct 10, 2013, at 11:48 PM, Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> Op 11 okt. 2013, om 07:37 heeft Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu at nigauri.org> het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have a question.
>>> Why don't you unite  name rules of  other architecture?
>>> Forexample, armeb is endian-big of arm.  mipsel is endian-little of mips.
>>> If you can unified name, arm64eb is better, I think.
>>
>> In an ideal world I'd do that, but that ghastly 'aarch64_be' is already in upstream gcc, binutils and eglibc  :(
>>
>
> Now that you work with them.

:) you can surely reached us before that...

> can you find out the reasoning behind it ?

we can ask...but it has been decided by ARM 3 years ago and we're a
bit late in the game. the we is including us, Linaro.