[OE-core] [PATCH 01/26] systemd: upgrade to 216

Burton, Ross ross.burton at intel.com
Thu Sep 4 19:37:22 UTC 2014


On 4 September 2014 20:30, Peter A. Bigot <pab at pabigot.com> wrote:
> Further investigation suggests that systemd-networkd is intended to do the
> same sort of thing as connman, though so maybe I need to shoot that instead.
>
> I have no answers, but just wanted to note that there now appears to be some
> conflict between connman and systemd that didn't used to be there. Maybe
> systemd-networkd and its constituent pieces need to be pulled out as a
> separate package?  Or some sort of conflict detection if both connman and
> systemd-networkd are in the same image?

systemd-networkd is meant for early init or "simple" configuration and
there's meant to be handover from systemd to connman.  At least that's
what I was told, and the connman authors have contributed code to
systemd...

Chen, can you look into this?  I'll chase when I'm up tomorrow if
you've not managed to resolve this already.

Ross



More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list