[OE-core] [PATCH] binutils: Allow gold to build even when not the default

[Richard Purdie]

On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 12:33 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Apr 7, 2015, at 7:51 AM, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > 
> > It can be useful to have gold available for testing even when its not the
> > default, therefore build gold by default in all configurations.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org>
> > 
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc
> > index afb582a..3c65efc 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc
> > @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ EXTRA_OECONF = "--program-prefix=${TARGET_PREFIX} \
> > 
> > LDGOLD_class-native = ""
> > LDGOLD_class-crosssdk = ""
> > -LDGOLD ?= "${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'ld-is-gold', '--enable-gold=default --enable-threads', '', d)}"
> > +LDGOLD ?= "${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'ld-is-gold', '--enable-gold=default --enable-threads', '--enable-gold --enable-ld=default', d)}”
> > 
> 
> may be enable-gold could be done unconditionally ? and then —enable-gold|ld=default controlled with ld-is-gold ?
> ld-is-gold anyway meant that default linker is gold, it did not mean
> to just build gold, so we are not changing semantics

The above effectively does mean we're always building gold, it just
controls whether ld is gold or not as before?

Cheers,

Richard