[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] ARMPKGSFX_FP ordering

[Martin Jansa]

See:

http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-November/112919.html

I think it fixes the same issue.

On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Matt Madison <matt at madison.systems> wrote:

> I was trying some multilib ARM builds and ran into an issue.  For
> armv7ahf-neon-vfpv4, PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS is coded as
> "armv7ahf-vfp-neon-vfpv4",
> but the ARMPKGSFX_FPU suffix was getting constructed as "-vfp-vfpv4-neon",
> resulting
> in 32-bit packages not getting found due to the name mismatch.
>
> The following patch fixes this by changing ARMPKGSFX_FPU.  I'm not sure if
> it
> would be more correct to change the PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS settings, but the
> 'neon-vfpv4' more closely aligns to the tune names, so I took this route.
>
> Matt Madison (1):
>   feature-arm-neon.inc, feature-arm-vfp.inc: fix vfpv4 suffix ordering
>
>  meta/conf/machine/include/arm/feature-arm-neon.inc | 2 +-
>  meta/conf/machine/include/arm/feature-arm-vfp.inc  | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.5.0
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20151206/18cfde7f/attachment-0002.html>