[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] ARMPKGSFX_FP ordering

[Matt Madison]

On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> wrote:
> See:
>
> http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-November/112919.html
>
> I think it fixes the same issue.

Close, but not quite, I think.  It doesn't look like it addresses the
ordering mismatch that occurs due to the -vfp include being processed
before the -neon include, resulting vfpv4 preceding neon in
ARMPKGSFX_FPU when both are enabled.

Thanks,
-Matt

>
> On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Matt Madison <matt at madison.systems> wrote:
>>
>> I was trying some multilib ARM builds and ran into an issue.  For
>> armv7ahf-neon-vfpv4, PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS is coded as
>> "armv7ahf-vfp-neon-vfpv4",
>> but the ARMPKGSFX_FPU suffix was getting constructed as "-vfp-vfpv4-neon",
>> resulting
>> in 32-bit packages not getting found due to the name mismatch.
>>
>> The following patch fixes this by changing ARMPKGSFX_FPU.  I'm not sure if
>> it
>> would be more correct to change the PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS settings, but the
>> 'neon-vfpv4' more closely aligns to the tune names, so I took this route.
>>
>> Matt Madison (1):
>>   feature-arm-neon.inc, feature-arm-vfp.inc: fix vfpv4 suffix ordering
>>
>>  meta/conf/machine/include/arm/feature-arm-neon.inc | 2 +-
>>  meta/conf/machine/include/arm/feature-arm-vfp.inc  | 2 +-
>>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.5.0
>>
>> --
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
>