[OE-core] Fido and dizzy collaboration?

[akuster808]

On 09/01/2015 01:39 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> Hi Armin, Joshua,
> 
> I've just been looking at the patches queued for the dizzy/fido
> branches. In fact I ended up merging them before I realised there are
> some issues.
> 
> The problem is there are dizzy patches which aren't in fido, which
> breaks our policies. 

I thought the changes had to be in Master first. Are you saying I need
to wait for them to be in fido first?

Could the two of you work to resolve that and give
> me fido branch to pull which resolved it please?

Will do.

- armin
> 
> I didn't take the dizzy patch related to S = ${WORKDIR} since that
> looked more like a change appropriate to master only. The bitbake
> patches also need handling on the bitbake list if we really do want to
> backport them to 1.26 and 1.24.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Richard
>