[OE-core] Default value for FULL_OPTIMIZATION

Khem Raj raj.khem at gmail.com
Wed Feb 3 22:37:53 UTC 2016


> On Feb 3, 2016, at 1:08 PM, Phil Blundell <pb at pbcl.net> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 12:59 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
>> in systems of  this age it should be yet.
> 
> Sorry, I didn't really understand that comment.

systems of today ( new systems ). read ‘yet' as 'yes'

> 
> For what it's worth, as a very quick and fairly unscientific comparison,
> I did "time make -j4" in a glibc tree and got:
> 
> real	1m38.812s
> user	4m6.420s
> sys	0m23.148s
> 
> and then I cleaned the tree and did "time make -j4 CFLAGS='-O2 -g
> -pipe'" and got:
> 
> real	1m37.299s
> user	4m21.420s
> sys	0m27.304s
> 
> I'm not sure these results are statistically significant but on this
> very limited evidence it certainly doesn't look like -pipe is providing
> any transformational benefits.  The real time has gone down a tiny bit,
> which suggests that -pipe is giving some extra parallelism, but the
> system and user time have both actually gone up in the second case.

Some bigger loads like webkit might be a better sample.

> 
> p.
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 204 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20160203/99193411/attachment-0002.sig>


More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list