[OE-core] [morty][PATCH] busybox: refresh the flock patch
akuster808
akuster808 at gmail.com
Tue Mar 14 21:43:28 UTC 2017
On 03/06/2017 07:43 AM, John, Maxin wrote:
> Hi Armin,
>
> It looks like this fell through the cracks. Please consider this for morty.
seems reasonable.
thanks for the reminder.
Armin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: openembedded-core-bounces at lists.openembedded.org [mailto:openembedded-core-bounces at lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Maxin B. John
> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 6:21 PM
> To: openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> Subject: [OE-core] [morty][PATCH] busybox: refresh the flock patch
>
> Upstream accepted the flock fix with some improvements. Backport those changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxin B. John <maxin.john at intel.com>
> ---
> ...e-the-behaviour-of-c-parameter-to-match-u.patch | 77 ++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox/0001-flock-update-the-behaviour-of-c-parameter-to-match-u.patch b/meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox/0001-flock-update-the-behaviour-of-c-parameter-to-match-u.patch
> index 8bcbd73..78520f0 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox/0001-flock-update-the-behaviour-of-c-parameter-to-match-u.patch
> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox/0001-flock-update-the-behaviour-
> +++ of-c-parameter-to-match-u.patch
> @@ -1,35 +1,24 @@
> -From 198f18addf1d814c2fefcb492f3b9fbd221669bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> -From: "Maxin B. John" <maxin.john at intel.com>
> -Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:24:45 +0300
> -Subject: [PATCH] flock: update the behaviour of -c parameter to match upstream
> -
> -In upstream, -c 'PROG ARGS' means "run sh -c 'PROG ARGS'"
> +From e1d426fd65c00a6d01a10d85edf8a294ae8a2d2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> +From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux at googlemail.com>
> +Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 18:19:49 +0200
> +Subject: [PATCH] flock: fix -c; improve error handling of fork+exec
>
> function old new delta
> -flock_main 286 377 +91
> -.rodata 155849 155890 +41
> +flock_main 254 334 +80
>
> -Upstream-Status: Submitted
> -[ http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/2016-April/084142.html ]
> +Upstream-Status: Backport
>
> +Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux at googlemail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maxin B. John <maxin.john at intel.com>
> ---
> - util-linux/flock.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
> - 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> + util-linux/flock.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
> + 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/util-linux/flock.c b/util-linux/flock.c -index 05a747f..c85a25d 100644
> +index 05a747f..539a835 100644
> --- a/util-linux/flock.c
> +++ b/util-linux/flock.c
> -@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ int flock_main(int argc, char **argv) MAIN_EXTERNALLY_VISIBLE;
> - int flock_main(int argc UNUSED_PARAM, char **argv)
> - {
> - int mode, opt, fd;
> -+ char *cmd_args[4];
> - enum {
> - OPT_s = (1 << 0),
> - OPT_x = (1 << 1),
> -@@ -57,7 +58,6 @@ int flock_main(int argc UNUSED_PARAM, char **argv)
> +@@ -57,7 +57,6 @@ int flock_main(int argc UNUSED_PARAM, char **argv)
> /* If it is "flock FILE -c PROG", then -c isn't caught by getopt32:
> * we use "+" in order to support "flock -opt FILE PROG -with-opts",
> * we need to remove -c by hand.
> @@ -37,35 +26,37 @@ index 05a747f..c85a25d 100644
> */
> if (argv[0]
> && argv[0][0] == '-'
> -@@ -65,7 +65,10 @@ int flock_main(int argc UNUSED_PARAM, char **argv)
> - || (ENABLE_LONG_OPTS && strcmp(argv[0] + 1, "-command") == 0)
> +@@ -66,6 +65,9 @@ int flock_main(int argc UNUSED_PARAM, char **argv)
> )
> ) {
> -- argv++;
> -+ if (argc != optind + 3)
> -+ bb_error_msg_and_die("-c requires exactly one command argument");
> -+ else
> -+ argv++;
> + argv++;
> ++ if (argv[1])
> ++ bb_error_msg_and_die("-c takes only one argument");
> ++ opt |= OPT_c;
> }
>
> if (OPT_s == LOCK_SH && OPT_x == LOCK_EX && OPT_n == LOCK_NB && OPT_u == LOCK_UN) { -@@ -89,9 +92,14 @@ int flock_main(int argc UNUSED_PARAM, char **argv)
> - return EXIT_FAILURE;
> +@@ -90,8 +92,21 @@ int flock_main(int argc UNUSED_PARAM, char **argv)
> bb_perror_nomsg_and_die();
> }
> --
> +
> - if (argv[0])
> -- return spawn_and_wait(argv);
> --
> -+ if (argv[0]) {
> -+ cmd_args[0] = getenv("SHELL");
> -+ if (!cmd_args[0])
> -+ cmd_args[0] = (char*)DEFAULT_SHELL;
> -+ cmd_args[1] = (char*)"-c";
> -+ cmd_args[2] = argv[0];
> -+ cmd_args[3] = NULL;
> -+ return spawn_and_wait(cmd_args);
> -+ }
> ++ if (argv[0]) {
> ++ if (!(opt & OPT_c)) {
> ++ int rc = spawn_and_wait(argv);
> ++ if (rc < 0)
> ++ bb_simple_perror_msg(argv[0]);
> ++ return rc;
> ++ }
> ++ /* -c 'PROG ARGS' means "run sh -c 'PROG ARGS'" */
> ++ argv -= 2;
> ++ argv[0] = (char*)get_shell_name();
> ++ argv[1] = (char*)"-c";
> ++ /* argv[2] = "PROG ARGS"; */
> ++ /* argv[3] = NULL; */
> + return spawn_and_wait(argv);
> ++ }
> +
> return EXIT_SUCCESS;
> }
> --
> --
> 2.4.0
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list