[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] wic: When using --use-uuid make sure that we update the fstab with PARTUUID

[Tom Rini]

On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 09:36:20AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Ed Bartosh <ed.bartosh at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 08:51:50AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 09:15:05AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 05:01:49PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> >> > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 01:46:16PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> >> > > > When we have been told to use the UUID we should also update the fstab
> >> > > > to make use of PARTUUID instead of hard-coding the device in question.
> >> > > > This will make the resulting image much more portable.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>
> >> > > > ---
> >> > > >  scripts/lib/wic/plugins/imager/direct.py | 9 ++++++---
> >> > > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >> > >
> >> > > Where we did we end up with this?  Ed pointed out that you can tell wic
> >> > > to use a specific UUID, so reproducible images are not a problem.  And
> >> > > making images that are readily portable is why other distros use
> >> > > UUID/LABEL and not device names as much as possible.  I personally enjoy
> >> > > being able to put an image on uSD for minnow and have it work :)
> >> > > Thanks!
> >> >
> >> > ping?
> >>
> >> I was just reminded about the real problems this solves (swap isn't
> >> /dev/sda3, boot is being excessively slow), so, ping?
> >>
> >
> > I'm generally ok with the patchset. The only thing I'm thinking of is if busybox mount
> > supports PARTUUID syntax in fstab. Can you check this, please?
> 
> It does.

It doesn't, you need util-linux for a mount that figures these out (or,
it did when I wrote the patch set).  That's why 2/2 only updates the
systemd canned wks as that _will_ have full mount.  But please note that
you can already make a wks file that doesn't work with busybox mount by
using the --use-uuid flag for non-root partitions :)

> > I'd like to see Otavio's confirmation that --uuid option solves
> > his reproducible builds concern.
> 
> I am not against it if the no-fstab-update consider this too. Using
> uuid when making a fstab makes more sense but the possibility to not
> touch the fstab must be kept.

Right.  I'm only updating the systemd wks file to use this.  Nothing
forces this option to be globally used.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20171106/182ed385/attachment-0002.sig>