[OE-core] ✗ patchtest: failure for "util-linux: add setpriv utilit..." and 3 more (rev5)

Changqing Li changqing.li at windriver.com
Mon Jun 17 03:59:53 UTC 2019


It should related to the way you send the patch.

Currently,  on the patchwork,  for this series, Revision 5 is like this:

[1/4] util-linux: add setpriv utility 
<https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/18163/#> 	162216 
<https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/162216/> 	Randy MacLeod 
<https://patchwork.openembedded.org/project/oe-core/patches/?submitter=3343> 
	Master Next
[4/4] bash: use setpriv, sed.sed to run ptests 
<https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/18163/#> 	162223 
<https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/162223/> 	Randy MacLeod 
<https://patchwork.openembedded.org/project/oe-core/patches/?submitter=3343> 
	New
[3/4] ptest-runner: enable child procs as session leader 
<https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/18163/#> 	162219 
<https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/162219/> 	Randy MacLeod 
<https://patchwork.openembedded.org/project/oe-core/patches/?submitter=3343> 
	Master Next
[4/4] bash: use setpriv, sed.sed to run ptests 
<https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/18163/#> 	162218 
<https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/162218/> 	Randy MacLeod 
<https://patchwork.openembedded.org/project/oe-core/patches/?submitter=3343> 
	Master Next

So patch cannot be merge.


There is patch of patchwork doc related to this:

Patchwork supports:

      * Re-sending a single patch as a reply to the reviewer email. This
        is usually only used when a few patches have to be resent.
      * Re-sending a full series as a new thread.


    +  [PATCH  0/3]  Cover  Letter  Subject
    +-->  [PATCH  1/3]  Patch  1
    +-->  [PATCH  2/3]  Patch  2
    |   +-->  Re:  [PATCH  2/3]  Patch  2                (reviewer  comments)
    |      +-->  [PATCH  v2  2/3]  Patch  2              (v2  of  patch  2/3)
    +-->  [PATCH  3/3]  Patch  3

+  [PATCH  v2  0/3]  Cover  Letter  Subject
+-->  [PATCH  v2  1/3]  Patch  1                    (v2  of  patch  1/3)
+-->  [PATCH  v2  2/3]  Patch  2                    (v2  of  patch  2/3)
+-->  [PATCH  v2  3/3]  Patch  3                    (v2  of  patch  3/3)

On 6/15/19 1:13 AM, Randy MacLeod wrote:
> On 6/14/19 1:01 PM, Patchwork wrote:
>> * Issue             Series does not apply on top of target branch 
>> [test_series_merge_on_head]
>>    Suggested fix    Rebase your series on top of targeted branch
>>    Targeted branch  master (currently at ca737408bb)
>
> This appears to be wrong.
>
> From my local repo:
>
> $ git log --oneline  -6
> 3461af0c76 (HEAD -> bash-ptest) bash: use setpriv, sed.sed to run ptests
> 7ab387fcac ptest-runner: enable child procs as session leader
> ef6ef10236 libcap-ng: split into libcap-ng/libcap-ng-python
> 11d5c1bbfd util-linux: add setpriv utility
> ca737408bb (origin/master, origin/HEAD, master) <------ same id as above
>             bluez: fix test case failures with GCC 9
> c6b49cb752 kernel-fitimage: uboot-sign: Check UBOOT_DTB_BINARY before 
> adding deps
>
>
> I was setting the 'In-reply-to' field to the original thread so
> perhaps patchtest is confused by that or I did something wrong since
> I've rarely used that feature of git send-email.

-- 
BRs

Sandy(Li Changqing)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20190617/3574d8f5/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list