[OE-core] [meta-oe,v2] kernel-fitimage: introduce FIT_HASH_ALG

Alex Kiernan alex.kiernan at gmail.com
Wed Jun 19 15:30:05 UTC 2019


On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 3:51 PM <richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 10:14 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 10:06 +0100, Alex Kiernan wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 9:48 AM Luca Boccassi <
> > > luca.boccassi at gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Richard - in case it helps, we've been using this patch
> > > > for a few months at $work (on top of sumo) and it seems to work
> > > > fine.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I expect that's true for everyone touching stuff in this class - it
> > > works fine for them... the problem is everyone else, since it's
> > > terribly fragile and has no tests.
> > >
> > > I'd not be at all surprised if changing the default from sha1 to
> > > sha256 doesn't break someone.
> >
> > Keeping the default to sha1 would be fine by me, it's the ability to
> > configure it that is useful.
>
> Its merged and it probably makes sense to change the default, I just
> continue to worry about how we can test this class and make sure the
> commonly used workflows continue to work...
>

I've a bunch of stuff I need to get out of the door at the moment, but
once that's out of the way, I'm going to see if I can get qemu +
U-Boot + FIT image as part of a test image as a starting point.

-- 
Alex Kiernan


More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list