[oe] [oe-commits] org.oe.dev mtx-3a.conf, nylon-image-base.bb: removed remaints from old OE code (PACKAGE_INSTALL instead of IPKG_INSTALL)

[Justin Patrin]

On 4/19/07, Martin Dietze <di at fh-wedel.de> wrote:
> On Thu, April 19, 2007, Richard Purdie wrote:
>
> > > > -inherit image_ipk
> > > > -inherit nylon_image
> > > > -LICENSE = MIT
> > > > +inherit image
> > > > +inherit nylon-image
> > > > +LICENSE = "MIT"
> > >
> > > Are you sure about that? image_ipk looks about right for me.
> >
> > image_ipk is incorrect and I'd mentioned this being a problem on the
> > mailing list - it was causing parsing errors. We have multiple image
> > generation types now and selecting them like that in .bb files doesn't
> > make sense so images just inherit image.
>
> I just noticed that not inheriting image_ipk actually gives me
> problems because ipkg-native is no longer automatically
> DEPENDed. Is this a bug or a featuer? In the latter case -
> where are maintainers supposed to put the necessary
> configuration?
>

I believe that is meant to be inherited on a distro level. The images
are generic and the distro chooses what package format it wants to
use.

-- 
Justin Patrin