[oe] RFC: Renaming uboot-utils

[Rod Whitby]

Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> Monday, December 17, 2007, 4:24:21 PM, you wrote:
>> Perhaps the MACHINE|DISTRO_FEATURES uboot should just
>> go away?  It was only needed to make the native mkimage program,
>> which really should be a kernel DEPENDS anyway.  Sound
>> reasonable?
> 
>   Let's hear Rod Whitby speak up, AFAIR, he added those features. But
> as far as I understand, no, they should be there, and are the way to
> add a particular bootloader support to *any* distro. Have a look at
> apex and redboot support at the same place. So, if you say that your
> machine has u-boot as bootloader, you'll get utils to manage it in the
> image. Ditto for other bootloaders.

Actually, I think NAiL added the uboot machine feature.  I only looked
at the uboot and redboot ones that were already there and added apex.


-- Rod