[oe] RFC: making uboot safe for multimachine and agree on one spelling
Koen Kooi
koen at dominion.kabel.utwente.nl
Fri Feb 16 18:00:47 UTC 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
After spending some time going trough u-boot recipes trying to make sense of its
buildsystem, I noticed some strange problems and inconsistencies.
First the easy part: we need *one* spelling for u-boot, instead of uboot, u-boot, u-bot,
etc. What is the preferred one nowadays?
Second: it seems that the 'mkimage' tool is at least arch speficic (at worst
board-specific), so uboot recipes should install it to
${STAGING_NATIVE_DIR}/mkimage.u-boot.${MACHINE_ARCH}
what do you think about all this?
regards,
Koen
CC: to Harald because I'm not sure he's on oe-devel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFF1fFPMkyGM64RGpERAsM2AKCo48tTjyY1DPoTYDp/41E8sOOMTQCeO8T8
urHBB7VH79uq3fyR/9jBzk4=
=E7Ei
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list