[oe] Fixing ipkg-make-index slowness

Koen Kooi koen at dominion.kabel.utwente.nl
Fri Jan 5 09:59:58 UTC 2007


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Paul Sokolovsky schreef:
> Hello Koen,
> 
> Friday, January 5, 2007, 11:21:51 AM, you wrote:
> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
> 
>> Paul Sokolovsky schreef:
> 
>>> Richard, what were the reasons for such conservative file matching?
>>> Filename matching should be just enough, as per OE convention, any
>>> package source changes leading to changes in the package metadata must
>>> lead to bumping of package recipe's PR, and that in turn updates package
>>> filename.
> 
>> It isn't enough. If you repackages the exact same files at a later date, the timestamps in
>> the tarball have changed, and hence the md5 will be different. When a user will download a
>> package ipkg will check the md5sum present in the index and abort if it doesn't match.
> 
>   Then we probably need to separate image building from feed
> creation/setup. IIRC, i-m-i currently run during image building
> too, and it steals precious minutes from each developer (vs
> distro/feed maintainer) multiple times a day. Having Packages
> to be updated only by explicit "bitbake package-index" seems
> like good compromise and corresponds to the docs which suggest
> to do that explicitly.

You just broke image creation with your suggestion.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFFniGeMkyGM64RGpERAuWLAJ4y9QdBlHDOykCtrTeaXUlAIt43swCggJEw
0hcn6JzjHod58DCGCLNtJ64=
=9Gmb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list