[oe] Status of ARM machines in OE

[Rolf Leggewie]

Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:

>> but still no SD, right?
> 
> What does rule 'Machine must have working 2.6 kernel' has to do with SD? 

That rule (which I understand and support fully, BTW) will break SD on 
the collie.

>> What is not usable for users in collie angstrom? 
> 
> There is no MMC/SD support, few other things are not finished in 2.6 port 
> too. Before those get fixed collie is unusable for users.

Well SD is certainly a major drawback.  If that is the most important 
thing, I would not call that "unusable", though.  Just certain parts are 
unusable.

Any machine maintainers for collie, yet, or nobody at all?