[oe] Angstrom Core Team

[Todd Blumer]

All,
My company, SDG Systems, has previously used Familiar for our released
products and we recognize that Familiar is now a shadow of its former
self. We plan to be involved in Angstrom releases. We also see that
Angstrom is the leading candidate moving forward and we plan to
contribute.

We have some special needs for our released distro (e.g. backwards
compatibility for our Qt users by supplying Qt4-X11 out of the box),
but our goal will be to use Angstrom as the base with just a meta
package on top.
--
Todd
irc: tnb

On 7/23/07, Richard Purdie <rpurdie at rpsys.net> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> As people will note, Laibsch (Rolf) has been frustrated by politics and
> personalities getting in the way of development and this is *bad*. I
> don't think anyone wants this.
>
> With this in mind I'd like to propose creating a formal core of Angstrom
> developers similar to that which exists in OE (and has seemed to work
> well as far as I know).
>
> The core team is basically a group of developers who can collectively
> guide the project. At the moment the leadership for Angstrom is unclear
> and this would clarify that and mean that a solid structure is
> established.
>
> Whilst I can't really call myself an Angstrom developer exactly, I do
> have a vested interest in seeing it become a success. Why is Angstrom
> important? Most of the other handheld distributions in OpenEmbedded were
> lining themselves up to work under the Angstrom banner. Familiar and
> OpenZaurus are dead projects and all hopes for handhelds support from OE
> now rest on Angstrom's shoulders. OE therefore has a vested interest in
> Angstrom and this is one reason I want to see it succeed. I also think
> it has massive potential if done correctly.
>
> What I don't want is anyone feeling the need for yet-another-distro
> which would be the next step is Angstrom's leadership cannot be made
> clear. This leads to fragmentation which is bad.
>
> So who should be on the core team? My thoughts are that Koen is an
> obvious candidate. I'd propose Marcin/hrw (experience from OZ),
> Graeme/XorA (developer/user) and Rod Whitby/rwhitby (to represent the
> other non handhelds that Angstrom supports). I'd also propose inviting
> Rolf/laibsch if he does consider coming back to the project.
>
> Membership of the core team probably doesn't involve too much work, you
> just need to care about the project, be involved with it in some way and
> be prepared to make decisions now and again and make sure the project
> agrees on a direction.
>
> Thoughts, comments, suggestions and alternatives welcome.
>
> I do think Angstrom needs some kind of formalised leadership though.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>