[oe] Canadian SDK support

Koen Kooi k.kooi at student.utwente.nl
Sun Dec 7 21:09:39 UTC 2008


On 07-12-08 21:11, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 09:00:47PM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> On 07-12-08 20:33, Tom Rini wrote:
>>
>>> As an aside, gcc-cross-sdk on arm(v6 only?) is blowing up in fortran,
>>> but I've got a git bisect narrowing that down now (30 revs left).
>> gcc-cross-sdk picks the wrong patch (from files/gfortran.patch) instead
>> of the correct one from gcc-4.2.4/gfortran.patch. gcc-cross *does* pick
>> the right patch.
>
> For gcc-4.2.4.inc would it be OK to rename gfortran.patch to
> gfortran-4.2.4.patch and fix this problem?

If 4.2.4 is the only using it (which I doubt), that would be the way to 
go. IIRC all gcc 4.2 variants (so also the dreaded csl 2007qX ones) need 
the one with '64', the 4.3.x ones (including csl 2008qX) need the one 
with '65'.
Yes, that means the current situation is broken for csl 2007qX and 4.2.!4.

regards,

Koen






More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list