[oe] Canadian SDK support
Koen Kooi
k.kooi at student.utwente.nl
Sun Dec 7 21:09:39 UTC 2008
On 07-12-08 21:11, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 09:00:47PM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> On 07-12-08 20:33, Tom Rini wrote:
>>
>>> As an aside, gcc-cross-sdk on arm(v6 only?) is blowing up in fortran,
>>> but I've got a git bisect narrowing that down now (30 revs left).
>> gcc-cross-sdk picks the wrong patch (from files/gfortran.patch) instead
>> of the correct one from gcc-4.2.4/gfortran.patch. gcc-cross *does* pick
>> the right patch.
>
> For gcc-4.2.4.inc would it be OK to rename gfortran.patch to
> gfortran-4.2.4.patch and fix this problem?
If 4.2.4 is the only using it (which I doubt), that would be the way to
go. IIRC all gcc 4.2 variants (so also the dreaded csl 2007qX ones) need
the one with '64', the 4.3.x ones (including csl 2008qX) need the one
with '65'.
Yes, that means the current situation is broken for csl 2007qX and 4.2.!4.
regards,
Koen
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list