[oe] Canadian SDK support

Tom Rini trini at kernel.crashing.org
Sun Dec 7 21:15:18 UTC 2008


On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 10:09:39PM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
> On 07-12-08 21:11, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 09:00:47PM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>> On 07-12-08 20:33, Tom Rini wrote:
>>>
>>>> As an aside, gcc-cross-sdk on arm(v6 only?) is blowing up in fortran,
>>>> but I've got a git bisect narrowing that down now (30 revs left).
>>> gcc-cross-sdk picks the wrong patch (from files/gfortran.patch) instead
>>> of the correct one from gcc-4.2.4/gfortran.patch. gcc-cross *does* pick
>>> the right patch.
>>
>> For gcc-4.2.4.inc would it be OK to rename gfortran.patch to
>> gfortran-4.2.4.patch and fix this problem?
>
> If 4.2.4 is the only using it (which I doubt), that would be the way to  
> go. IIRC all gcc 4.2 variants (so also the dreaded csl 2007qX ones) need  
> the one with '64', the 4.3.x ones (including csl 2008qX) need the one  
> with '65'.
> Yes, that means the current situation is broken for csl 2007qX and 4.2.!4.

OK.  So files/gfortran-4.2.patch, files/gfortran-4.3.patch?

-- 
Tom Rini




More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list