[oe] Canadian SDK support

[Tom Rini]

On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 02:15:18PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 10:09:39PM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
> > On 07-12-08 21:11, Tom Rini wrote:
> >> On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 09:00:47PM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >>> On 07-12-08 20:33, Tom Rini wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> As an aside, gcc-cross-sdk on arm(v6 only?) is blowing up in fortran,
> >>>> but I've got a git bisect narrowing that down now (30 revs left).
> >>> gcc-cross-sdk picks the wrong patch (from files/gfortran.patch) instead
> >>> of the correct one from gcc-4.2.4/gfortran.patch. gcc-cross *does* pick
> >>> the right patch.
> >>
> >> For gcc-4.2.4.inc would it be OK to rename gfortran.patch to
> >> gfortran-4.2.4.patch and fix this problem?
> >
> > If 4.2.4 is the only using it (which I doubt), that would be the way to  
> > go. IIRC all gcc 4.2 variants (so also the dreaded csl 2007qX ones) need  
> > the one with '64', the 4.3.x ones (including csl 2008qX) need the one  
> > with '65'.
> > Yes, that means the current situation is broken for csl 2007qX and 4.2.!4.
> 
> OK.  So files/gfortran-4.2.patch, files/gfortran-4.3.patch?

Well, gfortran-4.1.patch, assuming gcc-4.1.2 is including one that works
for it right now :)

-- 
Tom Rini