[oe] Canadian SDK support

[Khem Raj]

On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Koen Kooi <k.kooi at student.utwente.nl> wrote:
> On 07-12-08 21:11, Tom Rini wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 09:00:47PM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>>
>>> On 07-12-08 20:33, Tom Rini wrote:
>>>
>>>> As an aside, gcc-cross-sdk on arm(v6 only?) is blowing up in fortran,
>>>> but I've got a git bisect narrowing that down now (30 revs left).
>>>
>>> gcc-cross-sdk picks the wrong patch (from files/gfortran.patch) instead
>>> of the correct one from gcc-4.2.4/gfortran.patch. gcc-cross *does* pick
>>> the right patch.
>>
>> For gcc-4.2.4.inc would it be OK to rename gfortran.patch to
>> gfortran-4.2.4.patch and fix this problem?
>
> If 4.2.4 is the only using it (which I doubt), that would be the way to go.
> IIRC all gcc 4.2 variants (so also the dreaded csl 2007qX ones) need the one
> with '64', the 4.3.x ones (including csl 2008qX) need the one with '65'.

Why do we need these two. 65 one sounds worng to me from first look.

> Yes, that means the current situation is broken for csl 2007qX and 4.2.!4.
>
> regards,
>
> Koen
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>